>>12373203>why I think christcuckoldry is true today>-dude, your arguments are not even arguments. for example, saying "god exists, there are objective morals, god doesn't exist, there are no morality" isn't even a fucking argument. if you've read some of Hume, the cosmological argument that often begins with the premise of "everything has its cause" should be a fucking joke for you. there are no arguments in your list, besides some arguments that are aiming to eliminate the contradictions in christianity or to debunk the arguments against the christcuckoldry (e.g. a classical free-will argument against "if god exists why bad things happen" of Plantinga), but that's just eliminating contradiction in the christcuckoldry itself, not proving that christcuckoldry is the truth. i do think that i don't need to explain that "debunk the argument against the existence of god" != "prove that god exists and christcuckoldry is right", you do understand it, mate?>but.. my fine-tuning argument... hurr durr.. scientists.. they explore.. they've suggested.. they think.. it's a contemporary problem>-yep, you're right; suggestions, an open problem, etc - it's not a fucking argument, you dumb fuck, it could be an argument some day, but today it's just a fucking problem, nothing more>YOU UNEDUCATED RUSSIAN DRUNKARD FUCK YOU I HATE YOU DIE SHIEET REEEEKeksimus maximus. I mean, you're a goblino-christcuck from NA, so it's natural that don't know what argument is and that you're a fucking retard who just shits his pants and ends the discussion with "NIGGAH YOU DUMB I SMART & RIGHT NIGGAH SHIEET". It's always like that, no surprise.
