>>8631705>but you'd have to be an exceptional individual to be deserving of somebody who doesn't have at least two or three of these traitsFollowing the Bible is being an excepcional individual now? What a fucking depressing world
Also, don't be a moron, that checklist have points that don't apply to men, but they will still make you a better person
>And let's be honest, if you're on /pol/, you're not one of those individualsNice ad hominem, but Im used to crabs in the bucket coping when I call them out on their degenerate behavior
>This is literally no better than a fat landwhales listing her "must have" requirements for a guyExcept that women are liers, and Im not a woman, or a landwhale for that matter
