>>10905786And you believed me? I did say it and I didn't lie either. It's just that I didn't imagne that many people would believe it too. And I wouldn't have even alluded to it if I found it too personal to talk about. Also anonymity and all, it's not like you'll figure out who I am IRL that easily.
But I wasn't doing it as a streak, you know.
>that's not totally a bad thing if they can stay on topic, and it's better than them not readingIf they can stay on topic, yes. See, I don't know whether all that reading did them any good or not. Many of them had started reading philosophy too, but they have been quite selective about it. Have you ever read Schopenhauer's essay on the nature of women? They only want to read that sort of stuff, almost as if to confirm their own beliefs. So yes, it should be a good thing that they took up reading. In reality, however, they only want to keep reinforcing their convictions through it. Other popular books (fiction) among them are Stoner, Notes from Underground and Atomised, all of these featuring a character that they'd call an incel like themselves.
See, if you disagree with women you are an incel. If you defend them you are a simp. No middle ground these days.
Also that's not Korbo's. He got it from /lit/.
>it should be easier this way, shouldn't it?Online? Well, yes and no. You can be more open and more honest here. I believe I have said before that if the two of us had met IRL I doubted that we would have gotten along like this. But in this particular scenario, not really. I don't know how to properly articulate my thoughts when it comes to literature.
>Thoughts on Moona's moonas?Too small.
>>10907014I haven't seen that in a while.
Depends, will you take me to an aquarium?
