>>2107257>you wouldn't be calling OP names if you didn't want him to give the info, right?What? Yes I would, I was just returning his rudeness.
>your point was clear, but it was wrongPlease elaborate.
Actually refute my points instead of just claiming you have and quoting the OP over and over, as I have already refuted any arguments against me.
>tfw I win again, just like always 