Responding to these anons here since the thread archived
>>508013421>>508013571both of these are incorrect
Jesus was a Nazarene therefore while he was nationally a jew it's unknown if he would have been ethnically jewish but if he was he still wasn't the same as the other jews in Judea. Based on genetic evidence from the region of Nazareth it's likely he was ethnically Iraqi - Iraqi jew or otherwise.
The images in picrel show what Iraqi jews look like and they do actually look somewhat similar to the earliest depictions of Jesus in artwork like the way his face and hair is often depicted and like the oldest known drawing of jesus (top right)
So while Jesus wouldn't have been some pure white aryan gigachad (as this is just nonsensical and makes no sense for the region and his parentage, nor is there any particular theological reason why God would incarnate Jesus like that), he also definitely didn't look like some brown-skinned manlet like the jew historians 'scientifically accurately' made up.
