>>17641035>incredulity is not an argument. sorry.k
>just because you have some preconceived notion of what the debris pile should look like doesnt mean it was Jood't wet dream. that estimate is from mechanical engineers who study building collapses, it's a general rule for building collapses, I didn't come up with it.
But 100% of all non-WTC collapses comply with it.
>for anecdotes contrary to you narrativethat's not contrary to my argument
> see>>17641026the bathtub wasn't breached so the basement didn't absorb all the rubble.
