>>15365717>Are you implying every single Indo-European we know of were Aryan, except, conveniently, Yamnayas?ARYANS WERE SELF-DESIGNATORY TERM OF INDO-IRANIANS YOU DENSE RETARD
PROTO CELTICS AND PROTO GERMANICS BELONGED TO NEITHER OF THEM
ONLY PROTO SLAVS BELONGED TO IRANIAN CONFEDERATION CALLED SARMATIANS
ONLY SLAVS ARE ARYANS IN EUROPE
REST OF YOU ARE NIGGERS WEWUZING AS ARYANS SINCE 100 YEARS AND UNAWARE OF THIS TERM BEFORE 1700
>Your quote proves what I said, the fact the Greeks also knew the world Aryan shows it was used by Yamnayas PIEs.they knew it only from their iranian neighbours and didnt use it in everyday life retard
there was several ancient empires that covered both iranian tribes and greeks but greeks never called themselves aryan
>Indians literally call themselves that, retard.because they came from INDO-IRANIANS like slavs but unlike celtics or germanics
>Then why are Slavic Languages Indo-European and not Irano-Aryan?because it evolved too much over the years and because of our relations with europeans unlike rest of indo-iranians who hanged with central/south asians for the last 3000 years almost
>It's the opposite. And we all know how many mistaks the Greek Historians made.[citation needed]
you cant just declare historic sources as fake without explaining why exactly they are wrong with alternative sources or excavations for contrary kiddo
>Many of the symbols you showed as Celtic were also used by Germanics.and they are not swastikas like all proto-slavic/iranian/hindu symbolism was
