>>11122963Dear god!
That statement reduces a parent to an
>'observer who might hear CONFIDENTIAL information' passing btw your child & ANY PERSON a school district allows to have contact with your child.
~~~~~~~~~~~~
Example #2 of confidential info -Example #1 having been during Sex-ed, when an alleged teacher instructed your 12 yr old daughter how to masturbate, including the use of available common objects.
~~~~~~~
Your child: Sorry, I didn't get to finish the assignment last night.
Alleged Teacher: Hmm. You seem stressed. Is everything okay at home?
Your child: Well, my dad was late coming home. He was supposed to pick up groceries, so dinner was not made. Mom went ballistic when he finally got home, having forgotten to go to the store.. They had a huge fight, so I stayed in my room. Somewhere around midnight I made myself a PB&J...but the bread was dry, there was no more milk. I dk. It was hard to concentrate.
Alleged Teacher: Does this happen often?
Student: This whole year has been a mess. Mom doesn't go out bc she's afraid she'll get sick, and my 3 brothers and I always seem to get on her nerves, so she yells alot. We're not allowed to visit friends because we might get the virus. And, because my dad works with many other people, she's always afraid he's gotten infected. They are always arguing. I had a huge fight with my mom a few days ago. She grabbed my arm and wouldn't let go.
I hate my life.
>Etc.Immediately after this call ended, that alleged school official writes up a report, recommending the school call CPS to investigate the parents of these 4 children, who appear to be in danger.
>these are examples of 'confidential' information' a parent has no right to overhear.The child is effectively 'divorced' from their parents, being told their parents are not allowed to interfere in their life. The waiver becomes a legal document negating your rights to counter whatever Agency a school district hooks your child up with.
>sorry, but I'm incensed atm