Quoted By:
>aesthetically similar to the Balto-Slavic native religion movements
Just look into them, and I’m sure you’ll immediately understand, even if you aren’t Baltic or Slavic. There’s something about them that seems so absolutely right in a way that other neopaganisms have failed. For one, swastikas abound. In Rodnovery especially, I think one can see elements that would also spread into Germanic and Indo-Iranian religion, almost as if before their split (which is what I would aim for) or at least in a religious cline between them.
>hardened against Jewry
This should be self-explanatory, but, in case it’s not, obviously a new European religion should be structured in such a way that it cannot be manipulated from without or from within as Christianity and paganism are and were. No allowing a foreign people to control the money. No imperialism, which inherently weakens a people. No conversion of non-Europeans. A religion that works to do for Whites what Judaism does for Jews, without trying to make Whites into Jews (or vice versa).
>inb4 LARPaganism/We Wuz Vikangs
It is impossible for a European to LARP as a European. We can only become what we are. And even if it was LARPing, LARPing as a pre-Christian European is superior to LARPing as a Jew, which is what Christianity is.
>shout out to Tengrism
Tengrism is similar to reconstructed Proto-Indo-European religion is ways that cannot be coincidental, even though it is of Turkic and Mongolic extraction (supreme god is Heaven, veneration of horses, tripartition of reality, steppe-based nomadism, etc.). I think it, better than any other existing religion, shows what Proto-Indo-European religion might have become and should inform any such religious undertaking.
