>>5270829>>5270791>>5270804More absurds, for example in 23 and me dna tests all portuguese mark more than 99% european, your test, is just deep ancient ancestry (pre historic) and there, no european scores 100% anything.. your north african score is just neolithic drift shared between europeans and other caucasods, it's not related with moors whatsoever, but with pre history.
North africans are part iberian in the first place since they both share an iberian neolithic component, so admixture of affinity comparisons between north africans and iberians cannot truly determine how much "north african" an iberian is, the share literally pre historic dna, and north africa used to be a literally 1/3rd sub saharan, and started to get bleached hard by iberian farmers until they turned into 1/20th sub saharan, and then the arab expansion began, and they turned more and more african overtime.
modern iberians are not even a little bit close genetically of north africans, in fact we are more genetically close to any european for example to a guy in norway than to a morrocan (see pic genetically similarity, north africans are not even in the 30 closest populations of us.