Quoted By:
Women only have the ability to say no for as long as a majority of men respect and listen to that no. As women are rapidly finding out from third worlders and unhinged incels, "no" doesn't quite carry the weight it used to, and it's entirely their own fault.
Women aren't people. Women are property. If women were people, they could fight a man to the death bare handed and consistently win. Instead, they consistently get absolutely clowned on, bred against their will, and have the loudest and most exciting orgasm of their lives. Only men are people. Women are an asset to be traded, secured, protected, and sold. They are not "people," and they don't have real rights they're actually capable of independently asserting and defending. The only 'rights' they have are joke rights that were given to them by men, and which only have meaning as long as men care to give it meaning.
If men decided tomorrow that every woman that gets an abortion is dismembered and made an example of in public, abortions would stop and there's nothing women could do to keep "abortion culture" alive. If men decided tomorrow that consent no longer existed and they could just have sex with women whenever they wanted, there is nothing women could do to prevent that from happening.
Why would a woman want to breed with a non-chad? Your first mistake was assuming what a woman thinks or wants matters in any real way. Your second mistake was assuming the survivors of the future will have some ability to choose. The more realistic reality is they will eagerly sell themselves as chattel and bedwives in exchange for bread.
