>>16716060>18:86:6Are you retarded?
Why don't you just post the verse itself and make it clear exactly what you are talking about?
Is it because you know I will BTFO you?
>>16716061>The original Quran did not have any diacritical marks.The diacritical marks are based on the oral recitation and pronounciation of the Qur'an which has always existed.
Nice try though.
>It's literally one sentence between two verses.With a comma (stop).
Also, why is it two separate verses faggot??? Why not just one verse??
BTFO
Keep coping though.
>he's giving benefit of the doubt regarding your unfounded claims>unfounded claimsThere's literally translations which confirms what I'm saying and none confirming what he is saying LMAO.
Keep coping.
>He's right when he says "the verse mentions a place between the backbone and the ribs which is where human beings come from, which regardless of if you're talking about sperm or the fetus it's still factually wrong."It's not wrong at all.
Also I looked up the word ٱلتَّرَآئِبِ in Arabic and technically it means arched bone and can be interpreted as the arch of the pubic bone instead of ribs which are also arched bones.
In that sense it is also accurate a 3rd time.
No matter how you look at it it's accurate.
Cope.
