>>15736225>As for the le evil christ killers bit I wasn't really following. Are you saying the Jews were good to kill Christ? Nope, they were of their father the devil just like Peter in that decisive moment.So lets see jesus says Peter is Satan if he does not want the jews to kill jesus.
What does this say ?
> bit I wasn't really following. Was there not something in your theology about the death of jesus taking away all sins or something ? How can this be if there is no one to kill jesus ? How can you get jesus killed and all sin removed (or something) if there is no one to kill jesus.
>, they were of their father the devilSee this is impossible.
You literally downplay Peter literally getting called SATAN yet cling to "le children of the devil" now you are simply making things up.
Someone can equally say that
>Christians are satanists says right here their church was created on satanAnd go
>children of the devil ? All humans sin.This is why I was saying that this bible part explodes your theology.
Want to play the "SATAN = empty insult" game then "children of the devil = empty insult"
Want to say "children of the devil = super serious" then "all Christians are satanists"
>You claim to respect Jesus I do not respect jesus I'm an atheist.
>you wont' even read his words.I read the bible.