>>19713812Why do things fall at the same rate in a vacuum chamber if gravity is the warping of spacetime?
Surely a heavier/denser bit of matter would warp space more than some lighter/less dense, say a cannon ball vs a tennis ball.
Yet when you drop both at the exact same time they move at the same rate of speed until coming to rest. Should it not be that the cannon ball falls faster due to the increase in spacetime being warped?
What if it were electrostatics and matter stuck to the aetheric field that's constantly in motion? If you removed factors like density and buoyancy by using a vacuum chamber and dropped the same cannon ball and tennis balls their matter would literally stick to the field and go with the flow. It wouldn't matter how much matter you used, how dense it was, etc. everything would fall at the same rate of speed simply because it's stuck to the field and going with the flow like a stick on a river.
Which one is more believable and able to be tested thus more scientific too? Gravity or electrostatics?
