>>7934269Ok here are some easily found statistics. The proportion of professors in US academia who report themselves as marxists in the social sciences is usually around 20%
>Wait, you deny the Holocaust? Time to post the holy jpeg, you /pol/tard. I don't, but that's the thing. The very notion of even questioning it to you is hihgly heretic and anyone who supports this should be shunned from academia or even society in general. But is the holocaust numbers based on german records or is it an estimate? Same goes for the horrors in the SU, most of them are estimates based on the accounts of the survivors and people who have witnessed it. Yet you chose to believe in the official records that minimize it instead of what you percieved as anticommunist propaganda. Your mind is capable of recognizing that it is possible to produce anticommunist propaganda, but propaganda against things you dislike is a logical impossibility. This is the whole point of this discussion.
>he state isn't supporting communism. They at best tolerate people who do Marxist analysis.Yes, you fucking mongoloid, that's the point. The state tolerates and directly supports marxist thought while the same institutions demonize more reactionary views. The idea that they will "support fascism if things get bad enough" is conjecture on your part. Just because they may not support revolutionary communism doesn't mean that they will side with fascism, or that fascism is the only alternative to revolutionary communism. Your communist dialectic is so utterly bianry that it's not surprising thatyou think your enemies have some sort of institutional advantage over you when the evidence for the opposite is overwhelming. Amazing.
