>>1956015Reasons lads, finally. You never gave these to me before (at least I'm fairly certain you didn't).
>in the pocket of big businessWell that may be fairly valid, I suppose. Trump doesn't need big business to get elected as he already has a lot of money. Could Trump himself be labelled as big business though? A lot of people questioned whether he would take policy decisions that would aid his businesses, though I don't really buy into that very much.
>responsible for some of the biggest geopolitical blunders of the Obama presidencyDon't keep myself informed enough about these things so I won't try and debate them. Do you Trump could cause worse geopolitical issues? The Korea thing wasn't exactly encouraging stuff.
>seemed to have no concrete plans for the economy other than "letting Bill handle that"Do you think people would be better off under a Republican government and Trump then? Should they get rid of Obamacare?
>darker sequel to Obama's presidencyWould you consider the Obama presidency a bad one for us?
Finally, the reasons you gave me don't suggest "doing it for the lulz" (which is nice to see), so would you still consider Trump, now that he has been elected the most suitable and best of the two candidates for the job?