>>16062749It was largely debated up until the 1600's, wherein in a (((global))) meetup it was finally decided to keep "consistency" they would push Christ as the Son of God.
The fact is they, and certainly nothing you quote, can undo the fact, the most important fact, that Christ corrected many accusations amd questions of his lineage by stating "I am the Son of Man".
Now you are trying to Usurp the Messiahs own words with some lesser ranked halfwit who was discussing partiarchal family structures in metaphor?
