>>20349531>First of all, this idiotic fairytale is about as credible as Biblical LiteralismBiblical literalism is objectively more credible. Don't be a centrist faggot. There's no point appealing to these retards or trying to take a middle ground. Appeasement is what got us into this mess. If we had hung every atheist and rationalist that wanted to decriminalize sodomy and emancipate the jews, globohomo would have been delayed by centuries. The only person who cries for moderation and being reasonable is the devil. Sound doctrine does not need to 'progress' or 'adapt.'
Evolutionary theory is pure cope, and anyone who bothered to read Origin of Species would know that if Charles Darwin was alive today, he would consider his own theories to be debunked. Darwin argued that if it could be shown that cells contained complex machinery, and not a universal protoplasmic goo, then his entire hypothesis falls apart. Not only have we proven cells are complex machines, but Watson and Crick revealed a further level of complexity beyond that with DNA. Darwin would disavow evolution if he was alive today, and knew what we knew. But nobody bothers to read his book: they just worship his bust as the idol of a secular saint, like the faggot priesthood they are.
Everything we consider true in the natural sciences today hangs on the lynchpin of the old earth theory, which only exists because Darwin's theory necessitates it. If evolutionary theory is wrong, then everything, and I mean absolutely EVERYTHING, goes right out the window. The theory is lopsided, cracked, and fundamentally flawed, and modern advances have repeatedly debunked it outright. And yet modern academia clings to it, because not only are they too prideful to admit they might be so deeply wrong about something (Promethean attitude, end of history sentiment), but they also have no ALTERNATIVE theory that can explain life and the universe, besides Creationism, which they despise and consider heresy.