>>12445891>So not all italics are Latin, but all Latins are italics.italic doesnt really mean anything
the only thing you can find in italy during antiquity are:
>Aryans, aka the celts up north and latins in the middle>neolithic farmers, like the etruscans and a bunch of other random dudes>literal unironic africans in sicily, berbers and phoenicians at the time>a few greek towns in the far south of italythat's all you got, every single tribe was just part of one of these groups
>>12445892it has different names, the cope is strong with this one, and I was refering to the ancestor of italo celtic, italoceltic is a language branch, protoceltic is the ancestor language to both latin and all celtic languages
>>12445897>Language branching does not equal science, genetics nor history lmfaolanguage study is a science, and genetics and history confirm what language analysis said
I dont know why some people have such a strong compulsion to deny basic proven fact, saying italics came out of nowhere is as bad as the flat earthers, you are on the same level as them
