>>10908150>number It's not just a number...
>dosnt represent all your intelligence Ya that's true
>and your "skill" to use it. There is no "using" intelligence...
>its something that depends on a lot of different factors Partially true. It depends on different factors but there aren't a lot. Iq tests are the best way of measuring cognitive ability
>and not just in a number on one paper. He still doesn't get it...
Why did you greentext me calling you pathetic? Kekk
>is as easy to measure like the body fat That's not the purpose of the example.... You are calling it "just a number" while it's actually representing something (I hope a monkey like you understands it now after idk 10 times?)
>the intelligence and the body fat are both really really easy to mesaure, sure... Iq tests measure your cognitive abitily of finding patterns and abstract thinking. These are crucial points of intelligence. Ofc other points exist like the ability of memorization etc. And the results of iq tests can vary because of different factors. My cognitive abilities are weakened but still in the top 2%. I would get a much higher score with my full potential.
You truly don't understand basic points and you just keep repeating yourself. People like you are the reason why I have to dumb down my posts and my irl speech because people start saying I talk in riddles.
