>>14929449Here you go OP:
---> See image.
That image was made recently, thought it fits in with your thread here.
Some thoughts on the image:
Those two passages, one from Mary Magdalene and the other from John, have a curious relationship with one another.
The only issue is that folks have a difficulty with the discussion on "matter" (discussed earlier in the Gospel) which is arguably "Platonic" in a philosophic sense.
Many folks do not understand that Platonic philosophy and Christ's theology appear to be quite compatible, likely because they're both entirely "True" and therefore "Divine."
Again: Platonism in a philosophic sense; and Christ's teachings in a spiritual, theological sense.
The early "Church Fathers" appeared to have understood this relationship.
One either has Faith and Believes, or they do not.
As the image demonstrates:
---> In John 20:11 Jesus Christ is recorded to visit Mary Magdalene *first*.
---> Why Mary Magdalene? No one seems to know.
(Perhaps because she was the only one who remained at tomb while the others left..? See John Ch. 20.)
---> Therefore, it is entirely plausible that "the story" Mary tells in Her Gospel (or the story that is attributed to Mary), is what Jesus shares with her after His resurrection.
Of course, no one knows for sure.
And, curiously, the first *three* chapters are "missing" from "The Gospel of Mary".
... Missing?
Or, someone or "some group" is deliberately *hiding* those chapters from everyone else...?
If/when "Vatican III" occurs, that's likely when "the other Gospels" will be mentioned, however His Church decides they should be mentioned.
His Holy Spirit will guide them, has it has for the last ~2000 years :)
After all, The Church has compiled The Bible once, and they'll likely update it again in the near future with the "Nag Hammadi" Gospels added.
They're just slow; His Church works slowly, but that's okay.
Anyways blah blah blah.
There's an image for you OP.
It also has a sort of, "Easter" message too!
