>>20249518That's a good but incorrect assessment
A counterargument is here:
>https://retrochronic.com/#right-on-the-money-2>There is one of particular relevance to this discussion: consumption-deficiency theories of economic under-performance will become increasingly stressed as ultra-capitalist dynamics historically introduce themselves. In its unambiguously robotic phase — when capital-stock intelligenesis explodes (as self-exciting machine-brain manufacturing) — the teleological legitimation of roundabout production through prospective human consumption rapidly deteriorates into an absurdity. The (still-dominant) economic concept of 'over-investment' is exposed as an ideological claim upon the escalation of intelligence, made in the name of an original humanity, and taking an increasingly desperate, probably militarized form.>Insofar as the economic question remains: what is the consumption base that justifies this level of investment? history becomes ever more unintelligible. This is how economics disintegrates. The specifics require further elaboration.If you focus on the jews in this you lose the big picture
>>20249519Missing the point. Capitalism is about trends, decoding the trends, frontrunning them, and hyperstitiously engaging unto action. Anon asks the perfect question, because that's how it will become a real thing in the next decade or so.
You can't extrapolate over trends only when you want to and pretend to be retarded when convenient. The rate of advancement in LLMs and amount of money funneled into humanoid robotics paints a completely different future picture to yours.
