>>10119239>Uses wiki as a source>Literally makes up percentages>First, light eyes are not as was previously believed a recessive trait that has to be passed on from both sides of the family for someone to exhibit itThey still aren't, only blue eyes
Blue eyes =/= light eyes, there's plenty of light colour variations. Blue is a mutation on its own
>That eye color is not a recessive trait can be seen from the fact that so many half-black celebrities (off the top of my head, including Stacey Dash, Vanessa Williams, Michael Jackson's dad, and Rihanna) with light eyes
That's nice, how many have BLUE eyes. There is a difference
There are black people with blonde hair? It's not the same texture as European but the pigment is the same
>The earlier belief that blue eye color is a simple recessive trait has been shown to be incorrect.Right, Blue eyes are a mutation.
Your entire argument is invalid, both times you use studies with light eyed people and lump blue in with them.
Despite the very article seperating blue from "light" eyes
Light eyes are usually the same blend of light colours with one being dominant
Blue wil never be found in the blend of colours and none of those colours will be found in blue
