>>10136569What makes me uncomfortable is the two likely outcomes of this:
> He is legit: How can you trust a guy with that level of slimy, pushy enthusiasm to interact with young, vulnerable children? It is not like he is simply trying to make them happy, but he appears to be trying to gain their trust, and I feel that it is more for his benefit that theirs.
Physical contact is a goal of his. He is always coax to get hugs or kisses from them. I am sure the retarded would want to give a friend a hug and a kiss, because you know how happy and lacking reservation many tend to be. However, he is always angling for these interactions.
> He is insincere: Perhaps it all comes across as so unsettling, and we all suspect he has a selfish motive is because he is not a sexual predator, preying on vulnerable kids. In fact, the reason he gives off this self-serving impression is that it is one huge virtue signal. He gets off on the praise lauded on him by those who are drawn in by the act. He forces interaction with these children, because he believes it instantaneously looks like he has made the child happy. Of course, even a slow child needs to build rapport, and many I have seen are clearly uncomfortable in his presence.
Either way, his relationships are not genuine. He hops around the world, to "make friends" with children, many whom he will not see again, to pump out his faux-heartwarming videos.
Whatever the reason, parents are inviting this man in to their homes to use their children for his own ends. That disturbs me the most.
Either way, if he is attacked, he will shift frame the attack as through you are attacking a good Samaritan, and you would "rather have disabled, lonely children go without a friend, because you are a closed-minded bigot". Someone who acts like this and parades himself in front of the world is undoubtedly brazen enough to frame you as the monster.
All this is aside from his unsettling face, which only adds to the unease.
