>>10210213Your post is moronic and replying to your autism is no longer entertaining, so this is my last response to you.
>women don't care about sharing a high status guyNeither do men
>pretending they were tricked or can't take responsibility for their actions is retarded.Yes it is, which means it was consensual, as in both parties agreed, AKA a MAN and a WOMAN chose to have sex. It isn't just "women are roasties", they're not having sex by themselves or being tricked by that same few men, and if they were being trick, they would still not be guilty of anything wrongdoing.
>Literally means nothing without source and or how they got those results.Do your own research then, men are having more partners than women and that's hard fact.
>Doesn't disprove one man can bed and impregnate many women.What a moronic thing to say. I never said that, and I said I wasn't talking about pregnancy. Try learning to read.
>double standard in how women are treated for being promiscuous compared to men.LITERALLY what all of my posts are highlighting.
>Didn't say that you disingenuous cum stain.No, you just criticize women for doing it and criticize them for not doing it, see your folow-up comment:
>Pick one. most women do pick one of those and that's great. And yes, they are allowed to change their mind later and want to have children when they're older. As are men. Menopause is an issue? So is erectile dysfunction, why are you then not criticizing older men having children? Tick tick to ED? Makes as much sense.
>>10210221Did you know men can have ED in their 20s? Did you know men with a foreskin can have phimosis?
Why are you not criticizing all uncircumcised men or men past 20 for wanting children? Ah, because it's fucking retarded and makes no sense.
"But, when in their mid-50s hit menopause!"
And..?
