>>1035057Okay, so my approach to this is the following:
In nature, only men, women and some other really rare misfigured fucks exist.
Now, one could argue youre strictly attracted to traps, which can occur in nature but rarely. However, this symptom of gynecomastia is when a man has a rare disease that makes him grow boobs later in life (This exists, look it up). So first of all, if you were attracted to "natural" traps, youd just be attracted to misfigured men and therefore gay.
So lets come to modern Traps that have been surgically made to look like a woman.
Basically, these people are born as a male. Initially, youd be gay. The question is: Does the operation of a male to have tits and a little more hormones make them a woman? Tough question, but whilst it definitely brings the person closer to being a woman, it doesnt make them real women of course, because there are still differences, such as the dick remaining.
In a sexual aspect, what differentiates men and women is that you can fuck a womans pussy and her tits and that her pussy will have certain fluids to make it more joyful for a man to fuck etc. etc. So in a sexual aspect, which is the interesting thing when talking about gay etc. since these are sexual orientations, there is nothing but the tits to differentiate traps from men.
As shown above, this is a tough question, however the pros for traps being gay outweigh the cons. Think about it this way: The only con are the tits. Any gay man could wear a tshirt with tits printed on it. Youre fucking a man. With tits. Its gay. Its pretty damn gay. And you cant even fuck him in a pussy or something. Just the ass.
