>>10468312We live in a culture of censorship where people are afraid to do things and are afraid to even feel a certain way because it may offend someone. Imagine having pictures of your kids from 30 years ago at the beach, all butt naked, having fun. You have these pictures in your picture book, they aren't for public eyes, not uploaded anywhere, only for family and maybe friends and they aren't in any way sexual by themselves. Yet depending on where you live and who you told about these pictures, you could actually get arrested for production and possession of CP. That's how broken the system is. It cannot distinguish something pure from something that's impure. Or maybe it can, but it's simply evil to the core. It constantly praises violent criminals such as the recent BLM "victim", oppresses or ignores those who'd want to do good. Remember that the truth isn't interesting and that drama always sells. It's all a matter of context, not if they're naked or clothed. It's obvious that for different people such images will have a different meaning, but that's applicable to everything. For that reason alone we shouldn't subject ourselves to insane censor laws. This is a crazy slippery slope that can only lead to a dystopian future where wrongthink is a thing. A crime hasn't been committed and it shouldn't even be a crime in the first place to post non sexual images of naked children online. It doesn't matter if other people sexualize them, as long as the pictures themselves aren't inherently sexual. Lefty closet pedo virtue signalling snowflakes are terrified that they're attracted to such imagery, that's why they want to censor and destroy everything that makes them feel threatened. That aside, think about the following. If you've ever taken a picture of yourself or someone else naked with consent, yet you were underage, regardless of context, you produced CP. The internet is such a fucking mess.
