>>10743699Implying they would use the children's actual names in a lame attempt to disguise them as overpriced cabinets, so that any non-retard with google could trace it.
If this were real, there wouldn't be a single trace of this on the internet.
At best, this shit would be deep in the darkweb behind 9 proxies and VPNs.
In reality, if there's children trafficking going on, it's done by word of mouth through layers of verified middlemen, not online.
