>>10764006>1) it is more aesthetic for femalestroll/hard cope
females will say anything if they believe they should. US sluts say uncircumsised dicks are gross while Euro sluts say the opposite.
>2) it makes life a hell of a lot easier in terms of hygiene and cleanlinessThat's the dumbest take. The smegma is down below where the foreskin starts, which even mutiliated victims of semitic violence have to wash. The tip is maybe less smelly with mutilators but no smegma should accumulate there! Pro advice: wash your dick with water (no soap) just like you wash your hands.
>3) it virtually eliminate the risk of penile cancer (this one literally is not disputable)The studies were bunk, ackshuelly. Also, removal of a bodypart is drastic and should be done only with high risk organs (breast tissue in certain menopausal women for instance). There's almost no "penis cancer" and if there's really a metastasis growing, removing some foreskin would not have helped. Those garbage studies look mostly at a suspiecious sample of 3rd worlders living in feces.
>4) it decreases the spread of STDs (this one needs more study, but all evidence thus far leads us to this conclusion)Wash your penis, bucko. If STDs are even a risk you have to gauge and mitigate regularly, something is wrong with your lifestyle.
>5) the vast majority of Americans (white and non-white) are circumcisedSo what? The vast majority of US muricans are fat and dumb. This should be addressed, just like penile mutilation.
>To put it simply. The ancient Egyptians knew wtf they were doing.>Stop being a bunch of Neanderthals.Carnivor-Chad Neanderthals were probably smarter than ancient farmers. They also might have circumsized their dicks because ancient people did often stupid things (look up putative finger mutilation). The point is to NOT look at ancient races or peoples who were living in dirt. Have some White pride in your body!
