>>10794050>how so ?I remember when i was younger, everyone was asking, "What horrible effect does violence on TV and vidya have on kids' brains?" No on asks, "What effect does it have on kids' brains to see one little twinkle of light coming through the vagina of every photo of a woman?" I think it's much worse of an effect. Cartoons and drawing and paintings are better because they don't skew one's perception of reality.
>>10794054The internet being a cesspool, IMO, mostly translates into societal problems via photography. Without photographs on the internet, I don't think the state of the internet would be as strongly correlated with the state of society. IMO, photography warps people's brains.
Sometimes I hear people say, "Get rid of pornography." I don't support that because then you're always going to have people fighting over what you can or can't take a picture of. Getting rid of cameras, which I support, and which I will ban for non-military purposes in my kingdom, is blanket solution that solves many problems and is cleanly enforceable.
>>10794058Yes, cameras are important for science too. I mean to get rid of photography for being a giant media cancer that covers 90% of literally every person's day.
