>>10799718>Why is ok for womenHypergamy.
It's ok for women to be basically anything.
Standards don't apply to women unless socially enforced.
In the absence of civilization, males compete to be judged.
It is the male puffin with the large bright beak.
It is the male lion with the imposing mane.
It is the male peafowl with the colorful fail.
Etc.
When people say
>Civilization is the product of menThey literally mean that only men have an instinctive drive to build and maintain civilizations, because men feel an additional form of darwinian pressure in the absence of civilization that women don't.
Women can be conditioned to want to uphold civilization, but they have no biologically ingrained drive to want to do so, or to want to create it in its absence.
If the culture conditioning women to value civilization is deconstructed, women will stop valuing it.
If the culture conditioning men to value civilization is deconstructed, men will rediscover its value through instincts and darwinian pressure.
When a society collapses, the women still survive and reproduce, irrespective of whether they integrate into the conquering society or are enslaved and raped.
When a society collapses, men are just killed or castrated and enslaved, because the conquering men don't want more sexual competitors.
Women are very dangerous for the same reason inbreeding is.
When people inbreed, copies of recessive genes result in recessive genes being expressed.
Because recessive genes were rarely expressed in our evolutionary history, they have not been filtered and thus there is lots of bad shit in there.
Women are similar in that because they always get to reproduce regardless of the state of society, bad traits didn't get filtered out, because a women who behaves in a manner that benefits their society don't have an advantage over women who behave in a manner that destroys their society.
Women always get to reproduce, so the bad doesn't get filtered out.
