>>10986900What the absolute fuck is
That bastard isn't even a mathematician
Says so right here
>>10986926 (15)
The operations defined within
>>10986926 don't count as addition. It's true that under those operations 2▪2 might be 5 or 1. But that's because that isn't what addition fucking is! And also, compared to +, ▪ is a less useful operation that doesn't really pop up often.
How the fuck do you even become a former mathematician? Either you always were one, or you were never one. Why does this person get to stay in university?
Yes, I understand what
>>10987016 means, we can rename the names of operations and numbers and it will all be the same, like how people doing math in base 2 or base 10 can still have mostly the same behavior, like how the aliens might have different operations and mathematics we can't even begin to think about. Like how you can teach a child music theory but also teach them that the note D has frequency 440 Hz and it will be as valid if you had taught them it was 3141 Hz, or even define frequency in terms of per-Mercury-rotations. But that isn't what this 2+2 = 5 bastard mongoloid is talking about.
The bastard was saying:
"Statistical models are being used to harm, for example, marginalized groups across many parameters: “Whenever you create a numerical construct like IQ or an aggression score or a sentiment score, it's important to remember that properties of this score might not mirror the real things being measured.”
But it fucking does! Otherwise, there would be no point in assigning a number to something. There might not be a very big connection, but without the ability to assign numbers to things how else can we make sense of shit? If the numbers say something, and we followed all the proper operations, then the numbers must be correct, or one of the operations was wrong. What are the operations being considered in this case? The operations under statistics - testing for hypotheses, estimations, etc.
