>>1098826Maybe it's that online-self vs. offline-self. They feel like they got to repress their fetishes.
Honestly I suspect that they chose their fetishes or at least exaggerate it, and convince that maybe a slight interest in it is a massive one because they get off on being degenerate? I dunno... I've never met one in real life and they are too busy defending their pecadillos and writing off anyone who doesn't understand it rather than actually being like: "I like it because of X and Y it might help you to think of it like when you do Z"
>>1098827Look you might be one of the allright ones who doesn't derail threads or start a million threads about it. Nor I don't think footfags push to "normalize it" if anything they seem agast that people don't "get it", but they wedge it into threads where it's not warranted. The amount of threads on /tv/ that start off vanilla and end up with two guys arguing about some B-lister's foot is part of the reason I had to leave that shithole.
