Quoted By:
>a) The United States has two styles of regime: the passive socially-conservative style and the active socially-liberal one. This has always been the case since its inception, and is in fact by design because in order to have an active socially-conservative regime, you would essentially end up having fascism. This is in contradiction to the values and constitution of the United States. Both world wars were fought against an active socially-conservative ideology.
>b) The liberal side therefor establishes the new modes of culture and pushes the boundary through progressivism, whereas the conservative side has to play by the rules and even pander to this new culture, as direct opposition is an active socially-conservative position and therefor against the values of the US - nazism/fascism if you want to call it that. The conservative side will not establish a culture on its own, it will not even create an opposition to the new progressive culture - it will simply soften its impact, and once soft enough, will take ownership of it and proudly pin it to its own ideological flag.
>c) The United States is therefor, by design, an active socially-liberal country that will always push for progressivism, and once the boundary is overextended, will proceed to polish and market that progressive culture to the conservative opposition under a passive conservative government that was supposed to be reactionary, but was as progressive instead
