[78 / 18 / ?]
Quoted By: >>11083599 >>11083602 >>11083603 >>11083606 >>11083608 >>11083612 >>11083614 >>11083623 >>11083624 >>11083630 >>11083634 >>11083636 >>11083638 >>11083641 >>11083643 >>11083648 >>11083653 >>11083655 >>11083656 >>11083658 >>11083660 >>11083662 >>11083663 >>11083668 >>11083671 >>11083673 >>11083674
Hiroshimoot allows one thread to discuss board issues. So keep your grubby hands off this, kike jannies!
With the Presidential election drawing close and support for Trump being a bit more tepid now that he's running on a record, /pol/ Jannies have recently started aggressively deleting and banning discordant voices from /pol/. Pic related was a thread asking a legitimate question about something we've all observed - a rapid increase in schizo-posting on /pol/ in the last few years. But it was deleted, and no doubt the OP was banned.
/pol/ is turning more and more into a moderated rightwing echo-chamber where posters are banned for posting forbidden opinions, all under the loving hand of /pol/ mods and jannies. Is this a good development? Is this what /pol/ ought to be, and stand for?
With the Presidential election drawing close and support for Trump being a bit more tepid now that he's running on a record, /pol/ Jannies have recently started aggressively deleting and banning discordant voices from /pol/. Pic related was a thread asking a legitimate question about something we've all observed - a rapid increase in schizo-posting on /pol/ in the last few years. But it was deleted, and no doubt the OP was banned.
/pol/ is turning more and more into a moderated rightwing echo-chamber where posters are banned for posting forbidden opinions, all under the loving hand of /pol/ mods and jannies. Is this a good development? Is this what /pol/ ought to be, and stand for?
