>>11109652>>11109652>You're idea of history lacks a biological perspective. The elite military of Rome at the time of the collapse was comprised primarily of German stock.Your* idea of history lacks a fucking brain. I’ve never seen someone post this much retarded non-history revision in defense of a modern political theory of the world. Not even pig-headed marxists who think that everything is class struggle are in this complete rejection of basic knowledge.
The vast majority of the Roman empire’s territory in the fourth century was in Europe, meaning most of those slaves came from Gaul, Hispania, and Brittany. Were you not paying attention when your history teacher in fourth period talked about Germanic slaves? You should have, because I’m assuming it was only a few months ago. North African and eastern slaves were a non-factor in Rome falling, which is why I again point to the very well-accepted fact that the Germanic tribes sacked Rome. They did this because the majority of Roman soldiers were of GERMANIC stock, hired due to the vast empire draining the power of the legions and the corruption/inefficiency of the late emperors. Constantine disbanded the praetorians because they tried to kill him and significantly weakened the rest of the military.
>do you have a sourceMy source is every single fucking textbook ever written in the modern era. If this is insufficient for you—“he’s just diverting! He can’t respond to my ebin redpilled model! Everything white is good and everything nonwhite is bad!” Then here’s a tip:
Before you even think of revising history, you should at least fucking read some of the original texts. Your arguments don’t resemble a “new” view of the world, it’s a jumbled mishmash of ideas stolen from authors you half-remember. You are not fucking Galileo, you’re an idiotic teenager who reads to much /pol/ and mistakes it for verifiable evidence.
