>>11149776It's the societal/political implications that people fail to grasp (except for the screeching harpies, which is why they want to outlaw them now).
Look at what no fault divorce did to society for the last several decades: you used to have to prove your spouse was cheating, an abuse (as in actually beating you), or mentally unstable (as in, they were in an institution) in order to get a divorce. Then, no fault gets passed, and a harpy can take half your wealth and the kids, AND make you pay sousal support because she's "unhaaaaappy" ir "needs to find herself."
All the data is saying men are not having sex, wamen who delayed marriage to have it all are complaining "all the good men are gone" (you know, because "muh Peter Pan syndrome" nonsense), but in reality a lot of men saw the game was rigged and decided not to play. They aren't overweight cumps, but quality men who decided that they weren't going to lose their hard earned life on some thot who decided their vows weren't worth keeping.
Government, social norms, etc are trying to pressure men to "man up" and marry women who slut around, are divorced, etc instead of trying to find a quality man...whereas women are encouraged "not to settle."
Enter sexbots: it completely destroys all these power dynamics, especially once artificial wombs enter the picture. Now you have a companion who won't run out on you the minute she's "unfulfilled" and can have children who she won't take and turn against you while you foot the bill for her degenerate lifestyle.
This terrifies the powers that be.
