>>11244259>did you even listen to the video i posted? you cant hear a single bomb... thats the whole point. all i hear is rushing windWhat is audio compression
Single bomb, never said that, said a cascade of small explosions that form what would likely sound like a rumble, if it was the case.
>the dude was at the fucking base of the towers when filmingYes, that is at least 100 yards from anything, that is far, in terms of the inverse square law.
Do you expect defined "bangs" and "booms" if small shaped charges were detonated inside the hollow steel columns, when you have the noise of the entire building coming down to mask it?
I cant say for sure, it is beyond my knowledge, but your assertiveness is amusing when you know nothing of that you make such bold claims of.
>no type can achieve what happenedWow, I hope you get a job with some DARPA research branch if you know that much chemistry to make these grand claims.
It is strange that conventional explosives are used to bring down steel only structures all the time, and using shaped charges require very little explosives, due to the energy being directed, hence the name shaped charge.
You are making remarks on things I never claimed, I never said specifically when or which part of the building was rigged and to what extent.
For all I know ( guesing ) heat, due to thermite or what ever, or impact of planes/fire weakened considerable parts of the tower.
Blowing out enough of the center column and outer beams would likely start a cascade effect.
I still find it way more believable than nukes, DEW and what not. Since it is conventional technology, well understood and developed.
In the end i still find this pretty pathetic, if 5% of the energy spent sperging over secret james bond technology was spent on trying to raise awareness of the documented fraud and financial crimes surrounding the events, options trading etc we would get somewhere,
No normies or normal people will ever respond well to this nonsense.
