>>11328626Democracy and Republic-ism is okay so long as the various parties have to adhere to and obey a written Constitution that guarantee's citizen rights and limitations of government powers.
The majority of the world democracies that go to shit are the ones where elected leaders change said Constitution on a whim to suit their needs for party monopoly, personal greed, or lust for power.
If your unironically a Monarchist then a Constitution Monarchy has a proven track record for being alright and stable in places like Spain and Jordan for example.
If Libya had just forced their monarch to limit his powers via a Constitution then it probably wouldn't have turned into a land of tribal warlords and I say that as a person who kinda agrees with Gaddafi's finer and less batshit stances.
>>11328799Indeed, especially absolute monarchy. Maoism is more cringe though, sorry S1G. There's a reason why actual Chinese people don't follow that ideology anymore while fucking Naxalite rebels in the Jungles of East India do, it doesn't create prosperity and only obscure guerrilla rebels typically recruited as peasants or born into the rebellion hold on to such ideals since their biggest concern isn't muh stonks.
