>>11448370fine. "Infinitely more"
I revise that to, probably significantly more the passive globtito .
>how much knowledge does one need to justify a claim about the shape of the Earthlet me answer this like so.
if one model is correct then one should expect a,b and c.
if observations do not accord with the expectation, then that needs to be addressed.
Flatties are introducing credible doubts here and there. And the movement, although so patently absurd is proving quite resilient and stubborn. Maybe something is there. What exactly? IDK. I would not make a claim. I would encourage everyone to think about it though.
