>>11451776And just look at how they handled things in Victoria (Australia). If that doesn't sound draconian then I don't know what does. Almost as cruel as China's methods. Remember 9/11? Well, they introduced a bunch of new laws both in America and Europe which were meant to prevent terrorism. Only people have forgotten that they were advertised as being temporary. I can see something similar happening now as well. But I'm not saying that the virus is a hoax or anything like that, don't get me wrong. Though I do think that it's mostly harmless for those of our age (assuming you're not a grandpa).
>I think mainly i'd like to see a change in the work is handled.Doesn't sound bad at all. Also Denmark (I believe) toyed with the idea of reducing average work hours from eight to six. France even implemented the four day work week, but only in a select few places. I worry that this whole work from home nonsense will catch on, however. I'm not sociable at all, but even I find the idea of not having any real human contact whatsoever for ungodly amounts of time messed up.
>But i like cutesy shit so i'm always hopeful about that shit.So you like the idea of it as well. I am aware that reality is much more different than how I imagine things would be and I also know that most marriages (at least these contemporary ones) are failiures, but some just have to work out, no matter how rare. So why wouldn't mine be like that as well? See, I would say that oh, these days it's so much harder because of dating culture or whatever, but who's to say it wasn't just as hard to find a "soulmate" back in the day as well? People didn't divorce because it was frowned upon and supposedly cheating was rampant. So I'd say my odds aren't much worse that they would have been during those times.
Sorry for ruining your thread with le blogpost. But I did enjoy our conversation!
