>>11488343>Biden quitting and TDH coming tomorrow?Our illustrious guide brought dark horse up again, last night. picrel
However, from further conversation, he seemed to lean on the replacement horse's entry into the gate being much too late for stats to be gathered to wage against it.
In the end, after I asked if a new name on the ballot would ultimately negate the mail-ins that SPECIFICALLY voted FOR BIDEN...
...he replied: "Rapid fire election redo before we have time to dig up dirt on Dark Horse"
>There's an interesting dichotomy at play here in the wording he used. First: "They still have a Dark Horse in the wings BW" ...*A* Dark Horse.The second time, simply: "on Dark Horse."
▪What this truly alludes to I cannot know, however, early on there were two Red Herrings. We thought chinkworth was the first, but, maybe the first was Kamala.
That might leave *the first* Biden replacement as the second...leading to outrage over a new name on a ballot that mail-ins did not vote for...
>necessitating the DNC to do a 180, and announce a replacement their Voters found a reasonable candidate able to win.▪ calls for New Voting emerge with a proper candidate, the first results being 86'd...
...BUT, HOW a new date is quickly set, a new candidate announced, new ballots printed, mailed, posted, etc., etc. -all in such record time that his statement rings true: " "Rapid fire election redo BEFORE we have time to dig up dirt on Dark Horse"
>I just don't see it.Any lapse in time allows a digging of sub-basements.
~~~~~~
It's all so odd. Therefore, I will just sit back and watch the show, to see what actually plays out.
What a ride we all are on.
