>>11663361So in summary luck is a determining whether or not love, hate or any other emotion has any effect on you. I think this kind of thinking reverses cause and effect. You act different according to your emotions(or not), it changes your way of doing things and even though the final result is uncertain it gives you momentum before its concluded. So saying that emotions affect nothing at all is exactly what inhuman machine would say.
>all what it does depends on luck, the opposite person, group, or community, thus, it can be taken as a robotic nature taking the facts mentioned,I'm not sure i understand. I understand that different environment determinates the outcome but in no way does that mean someone acts inhuman when challenging(while i guess analysing the situation) it with concrete set of emotions.
The latter part doesn't really address anything that we are discussing, merely a human behaviour so i want dwell into it. And besides... It's far more important to me how you act in the presence of the known not unknown. The unknown migh be scary but is neutral. Emotions toward those close to you or those you are emotionally invested in... is what im after here.
You clearly care for the communist-national socialist conflict. Tell me about it instead. What drives your action there?
