>>1171022> Moral Relativism?Because we can predict things based on past events? What kind of moral structure are you proposing? Can we only condemn things after they happen in that specific instance but can't try to prevent those things from happening again?
I'm not saying it is wrong because I disagree, I'm saying it is wrong because it is destructive to yourself and others.
> Malthusian, we need fewer people argumentEven if that was a problem you could appreciably impact then the solution would be not to have sex. The fact that a problem exists does not justify other destructive behaviors just because you aren't contributing to some other problem.
> Why do you care?To be honest, I don't, I'm just letting you know why you'd get locked up for it.
