>>11848491>Would you call chemists engineers?Semi.
There is lots of theory and all the practical stuff is memorizing how reactions work.
>Isn't it good that a poor theory was disproved?Yes you get a gold start for this, only why was this crap introduced in the first place?
you notice that engineering never got disproved on anything
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GuJTm9aKuvsThis works 1000 years later or 2000 years later.
Sure they did not give detailed measurements other then "lots of wood here LOL" however it still works.
>Isn't it good that a poor theory was disproved?You realize that its a modern cope to explain why science gets disproved.
Science is only the first step away from primitivism, only a stepping stone to be abandoned.
>Usually science works out what makes something tick and engineers apply it in practice.Nice bullshit and wrong. Show me the aether powered engine or whatever.
It literally does not exist science can equally say >you see your car that you made is powered by tiny invisible people ! They are invisible impossible to detect and live inside of gasoline
This is what science always was.
If you reject this as science you will have to abandon shit loads of things like dark energy.
Philosophizing and natural philosophy really show what science is really doing.
Making up unprovable concepts and asserting its true.
>Can be applicable, but only partially true.Its literally the name that "science" existed under since old times you can read about natural philosophers and these scientists calling themselves natural philosophers back in the day.
Did you seriously try to challenge if you did not get tricked by bullshiters (who get shit loads of government money BTW) ?
>choice to the "sky daddy".I'm an atheist.
Here is the thing without atheism you are lost. Scientists are not different from the church saying it has all the answers.
Emeroldianism was never about anything other then finding out truth and not getting swindled.
1of 2
