>>11906579I want no one to hurt each other.
Suffering is and will always be a fact of life, but there's no good reason why *inflicting* suffering has to be.
You say we should "sort out the bad from the good." But what about ideologies that judge certain *people* as "the bad?" Should those people be "sorted out" too?
Personally I don't think so, because to do so would be to hurt them. I won't stand to see *anyone* hurt by anyone else on purpose. I won't protect only whites or only nonwhites, only women or only men, only cisgender heterosexuals or only lgbt, et cetera. I demand that *everyone* be protected. For the greater good, I suppose I *might* be inclined to sacrifice the owners of the multinational corporate conglomerates that control the world, but that's *all.* They are the *only* party to whom I deign to assign guilt, and I *demand* that *no one else* suffer unnecessarily.
I will settle for nothing less than a world where no one deliberately hurts anyone else, nor *would* anyone hurt any hypothetical other person for any reason except to prevent clear and immediate threat of harm. The world envisioned by the nazis does not qualify because in an aryan world, indeed no one would *in fact* hurt anyone else, but people would still be *inclined* to hurt hypothetical people for not being aryan like them, a condition that falls short of the standard of clear and immediate threat of harm.
Some might say the world I envision is impossible. I don't care if it's possible or not, I still believe the farther we move away from real harm that has been done to real people in the past, the closer we'll approach the world I envision where malice does not exist.
