>>11926901He's wrong in that there is no alternative to Twitter to voice his message. While Parler existed as a competitor to Twitter, it was quickly quashed by Apple, Amazon and Google. Without a website to communicate his thoughts, he is effectively being censored by Twitter, which can argued as limiting his freedom of speech. If Twitter wants to ban him from their website, there is a precedence set that platforms can restrict information from a (still standing until inauguration) President. Having corporations decide what information the public readily has access to is detrimental for everyone of any political alignment.
