>>12058738Of course I'm only grasping at straws, but from what I've read as far as weaponry is concerned, >"asymmetric quantum well" potentials
could very well explain what we witnessed in various videos from the scene, especially that over-city webcam that showed an 'laser-like' beam that suddenly appeared as it got closer to the ground, then,
having found picrel, which references increased potential of quantum wells in the presence of (?) ammonia--and knowing there were alleged reports that the RV itself (unless it was reported as an excuse for the presence of ammonia) was "filled with bags of ammonium nitrate"-- I can't help but wonder if the initial dispersion of the ammonia compound was the vehicle that allowed any assymetic quantum welled weapon to "suddenly" increase in potenial---> which would explain why it was not seen until its beam hit the cloud of ammonium nitrate.
~~~~~~
>Back in December when I posted that city-scape cam clip that shows the laser-like glow, I commented that the only way I could account for that ONLY appearing once it hit the surface would be something in the atmosphere down there that caused whatever 'invisible' weapon that was used to ignite like that.As I think of it now, if it was such an energy pulse that caused the RV full of ammonium nitrate to blow up, that would account for the yet undissapated remains of the excited atoms in the energy beam to hyper-excite and suddenly glow.
>something like that, as my mind sees itOf course, I am only grasping at straws. Of all the definitions I found for "aqw", this was the one that immediately caught my eye.
