[286 / 59 / ?]
Quoted By: >>12095025 >>12095029 >>12095033 >>12095034 >>12095036 >>12095037 >>12095038 >>12095041 >>12095042 >>12095049 >>12095054 >>12095060 >>12095061 >>12095070 >>12095071 >>12095074 >>12095077 >>12095082 >>12095084 >>12095085 >>12095092 >>12095094 >>12095095 >>12095096 >>12095099 >>12095101 >>12095105 >>12095107 >>12095115 >>12095119 >>12095133 >>12095137 >>12095138 >>12095146 >>12095147 >>12095151 >>12095152 >>12095156 >>12095158 >>12095164 >>12095169 >>12095174 >>12095182 >>12095185 >>12095191 >>12095194 >>12095202 >>12095203 >>12095206 >>12095220 >>12095221 >>12095225 >>12095234 >>12095236 >>12095237 >>12095239 >>12095241 >>12095242 >>12095243 >>12095246 >>12095247 >>12095253 >>12095264 >>12095273 >>12095274 >>12095278 >>12095279 >>12095280 >>12095281 >>12095287 >>12095295 >>12095300
SCOTUS WILL BE FORCED TO LOOK AT AND REVIEW ELECTION FRAUD EVIDENCE ON FEBRUARY 19TH. IT'S LITERALLY OVER FOR BIDEN!
>Donald Trump v Pennsylvania SoS
>Lin Wood v Georgia SoS
>Sidney Powell v Michigan SoS
>https://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docket/docketfiles/html/public%5C20-845.html
>DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/19/2021.
Chief Justice John Roberts either has to sit this one out (apparently the delay from January 22th - original date of SCOTUS conference - is because one of the supreme judges is personally implicated in the case and would not be able to do his job in a neutral way), which would mean the others could do their job without Roberts' corrupt influence OR Roberts has to actually acknowledge election fraud. Either way, after February 19th the supreme court of the United States will NOT be able to claim ignorance to election fraud. If they do, every single NATO member should just quit NATO, because being in a military alliance with a banana republic is not a smart geopolitical decision, to say the least.
So what do these cases mean?
When the transparency of the vote counting process had been blocked in a certain voting district, the results of that district ought to be audited. Audit =/= recount. They will actually check each vote (reminder that they only need to check the votes cast in districts where poll watchers/vote counters have sworn statements that they had seen illegal practices) and see if the person behind those votes is real or not. This is where many of the fake votes will fail the test. This only needs to successfully happen in a single state, and SCOTUS February 19th ruling could force Pennsylvania, Georgia or Michigan, or even all of them, to have a real audit.
The first domino has already fallen in NY 22nd congressional district. NY state court threw out all of the illegal votes and this changed the end result:
>http://www.courts.state.ny.us/REPORTER/3dseries/2021/2021_21018.htm
>Donald Trump v Pennsylvania SoS
>Lin Wood v Georgia SoS
>Sidney Powell v Michigan SoS
>https://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docket/docketfiles/html/public%5C20-845.html
>DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/19/2021.
Chief Justice John Roberts either has to sit this one out (apparently the delay from January 22th - original date of SCOTUS conference - is because one of the supreme judges is personally implicated in the case and would not be able to do his job in a neutral way), which would mean the others could do their job without Roberts' corrupt influence OR Roberts has to actually acknowledge election fraud. Either way, after February 19th the supreme court of the United States will NOT be able to claim ignorance to election fraud. If they do, every single NATO member should just quit NATO, because being in a military alliance with a banana republic is not a smart geopolitical decision, to say the least.
So what do these cases mean?
When the transparency of the vote counting process had been blocked in a certain voting district, the results of that district ought to be audited. Audit =/= recount. They will actually check each vote (reminder that they only need to check the votes cast in districts where poll watchers/vote counters have sworn statements that they had seen illegal practices) and see if the person behind those votes is real or not. This is where many of the fake votes will fail the test. This only needs to successfully happen in a single state, and SCOTUS February 19th ruling could force Pennsylvania, Georgia or Michigan, or even all of them, to have a real audit.
The first domino has already fallen in NY 22nd congressional district. NY state court threw out all of the illegal votes and this changed the end result:
>http://www.courts.state.ny.us/REPORTER/3dseries/2021/2021_21018.htm
