>>12262580> Yes but they were freeSlavery was common, the most wealthy tribes had large slave industries.
> Taoism and Confucian philosophies: Is man happier living off the land, unemcimbered by the demands of civilization, or does one find joy in the comforts of easy calories and shelter.Considering these religions were ceated in civilisations, by civilised people, with civilised means of language, logic, political thought, etc and none chose to live in nature, rather they chose to use civilisation to spread their ideas, it's clear the creators of these religions were nothing more than sheltered men. They were afforded the ability by a strong civilisation to propose absolutely foolish ideas of living in nature. If they knew better, and they probably did but were liars, they would never profess such suicidal ideations.
> Depends on the person.Everyone has a plan until they get punched in the mouth. There is only a narrow path of survival, very few situations survive on the "depends on the person" motto, because most of those persons will die, and many will die horrific deaths.
>>12262581> With modern job and modern quality of food he is only going to gain diabetes, become obese, bald, lose all his teeth, become an incel and die of heart disease in his 50'sWe have an objectively higher quality of life longevity. Being an incel is very much a choice, inceldom is a mental disease. It's better to live in a society where death is more of a choice that an oppressively state of horrific predation by your own mankind.
> Without understanding of health and nutrition, which was not needed back then.Their lack of understanding led to countless needless deaths and suffering.
